Comments on: Full Circle to Smalltalk http://leshazlewood.com/2006/02/18/full-circle-to-smalltalk/ Where Les is More Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:30:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Norberto Ortigoza http://leshazlewood.com/2006/02/18/full-circle-to-smalltalk/comment-page-1/#comment-74 Norberto Ortigoza Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:57:14 +0000 http://www.leshazlewood.com/?p=7#comment-74 Hi Les, I think this <a href="http://www.glorp.org/documentation.html" title="ORM project" rel="nofollow"> is the one you are looking for. Excellent post! Hi Les,

I think this is the one you are looking for.

Excellent post!

]]> By: Rene http://leshazlewood.com/2006/02/18/full-circle-to-smalltalk/comment-page-1/#comment-73 Rene Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:37:24 +0000 http://www.leshazlewood.com/?p=7#comment-73 (First, I have to admit to not being as smart/geeky as most folks who would be reading this.) This was an interesting article - I strongly agree with almost everything you said. Oddly - I came across your page by doing a google search on 'awsome smalltalk ide'. I'm looking for a Java IDE that is similar to the VisualWorks Smalltalk IDE. I miss the visually organized class hierarchy and the fact that the only code that appears in the edit window is the code in the method I'm modifying. The Envy version control was wonderful. I also liked being able to group methods within a class by category. We used Toplink as our Smalltalk ORM. I have nothing to compare it to, so don't know how it rates, but it was easy to implement and did the job. (Like Smalltalk, however, Toplink costs.) I'm not sure about frameworks like Struts, but my team spent a year refactoring an app to implement our own internally designed framework. My thought is that if our little team could come up with a good framework within a year (while getting other "real work" done) it seems reasonable that the open-source community could come up with something reliable in a short time. I'm all for the success of Smalltalk and morn its demise. Thanks for the article. (First, I have to admit to not being as smart/geeky as most folks who would be reading this.) This was an interesting article – I strongly agree with almost everything you said. Oddly – I came across your page by doing a google search on ‘awsome smalltalk ide’. I’m looking for a Java IDE that is similar to the VisualWorks Smalltalk IDE. I miss the visually organized class hierarchy and the fact that the only code that appears in the edit window is the code in the method I’m modifying. The Envy version control was wonderful. I also liked being able to group methods within a class by category. We used Toplink as our Smalltalk ORM. I have nothing to compare it to, so don’t know how it rates, but it was easy to implement and did the job. (Like Smalltalk, however, Toplink costs.) I’m not sure about frameworks like Struts, but my team spent a year refactoring an app to implement our own internally designed framework. My thought is that if our little team could come up with a good framework within a year (while getting other “real work” done) it seems reasonable that the open-source community could come up with something reliable in a short time. I’m all for the success of Smalltalk and morn its demise. Thanks for the article.

]]> By: Floyd Marinescu http://leshazlewood.com/2006/02/18/full-circle-to-smalltalk/comment-page-1/#comment-72 Floyd Marinescu Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:54:44 +0000 http://www.leshazlewood.com/?p=7#comment-72 Hi Les, great post. I was wondering if you'd be interested in massaging this into an article on why Groovy could be the next Smalltalk? Email me. Hi Les, great post. I was wondering if you’d be interested in massaging this into an article on why Groovy could be the next Smalltalk? Email me.

]]>